NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD FirePro M5800
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+484%
3.041 TFLOPS
FirePro M5800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
26W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Madison
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
