Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 A375 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1485MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +134%
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 A375
1.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.24 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.60 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1299 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Venus
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy