Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 150 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 141W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +506%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
0.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
896
Shading Units
128
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.81 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
47.23 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
470.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
141W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G92
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy