NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+202%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
7
896
Shading Units
336
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
90W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GF104
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
