NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
90W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
RV560
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Turing
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
