NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs Intel Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2050MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Arc A380
+47%
4.198 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2020
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
