Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Sep 2005
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 6 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
NV42
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
6800 XT
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.202 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
222 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy