Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +2074%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GT216
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy