Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +247%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jul 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy