CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon R7 350
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
AMD Radeon R7 350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+247%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
VS
Radeon R7 350
Graphics Card
Jul 2020
Release Date
Jul 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
3
Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy