Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X800 GTO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 80W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
R423
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
R423 GTO
Turing
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
289 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy