Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S7150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +26%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tonga
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy