Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +6531%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT218
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy