Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +10189%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1 GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G86S
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net