Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 5450 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +2769%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5450 PCIe x1
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
80
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cedar
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy