Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +331%
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Oland
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy