CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 380
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 380
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon R9 380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 380 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380
+16%
3.476 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+28%
3593
Radeon R9 380
2791
GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon R9 380
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.476 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.476 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Antigua
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T1000
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 DDR4
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy