Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Sky 700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Sky 700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 6GB VRAM Radeon Sky 700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Sky 700 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon Sky 700 +8%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Sky
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy