NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+148%
4.101 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+242%
4973
FirePro W6150M
1452
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
