Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1335MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +468%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy