NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 174.3GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+17%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
