CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
+1205%
4.884 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
VS
GeForce GTX 280M
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-IV
Clock Speeds
1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
128
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
3
AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Steam Deck GPU
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy