NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
+1830%
4.884 TFLOPS
NVS 5400M
0.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
N13P-NS1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
