Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 +718%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cayman
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy