Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 +29%
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GK107-300-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy