NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages

Released 11 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock1590MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

680 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (80W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

0.536 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +431%

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Jul 2020

GeForce 200

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1410 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1590 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

448bit

Memory Bus

128bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

14

-

Compute Units

-

216

Shading Units

896

72

TMUs

56

28

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

224 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

50.88 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

89.04 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

5.699 TFLOPS

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.849 TFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

TU116

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

TU116-150-KA-A1

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

12 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

80W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

7.5

4.0

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

5

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCI

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Related News

1

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

2

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

3

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

4

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

5

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

6

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

7

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

8

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

9

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

10

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It