NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)

AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock1050MHz

168 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (65W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

0.536 TFLOPS

Radeon R7 250 OEM +50%

0.806 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

Radeon R7 250 OEM

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Oct 2013

GeForce 200

Generation

Volcanic Islands

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1000 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1050 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

1000 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

DDR3

448bit

Memory Bus

128bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

32.00GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

-

Compute Units

6

216

Shading Units

384

72

TMUs

24

28

ROPs

8

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

224 KB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

8.400 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

25.20 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

-

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

806.4 GFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

Oland

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

Oland XT (215-0837000)

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

28 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

0.95 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

77 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

65W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

1.2

N/A

Vulkan

1.2

1.3

CUDA

-

4.0

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

5

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition

Related News

1

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

2

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

3

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

4

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

5

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

6

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

7

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

8

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

9

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

10

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It