Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 171W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV516
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
27W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy