Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +619%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy