Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 101

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
P102 101 +2475%
10.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
320bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
25
192
Shading Units
3200
64
TMUs
200
28
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP102
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy