Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +1035%
0.477 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV610
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy