Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +2547%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
70
192
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
28
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy