Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireGL V8600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (159W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +8%
0.477 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
159W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
R600
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy