Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 182W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV516
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy