Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +998%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy