Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +109%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
320bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
12
192
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
143W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G80
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.0
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy