Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +14%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
3
192
Shading Units
144
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF116
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy