Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (102W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645 OEM +87%
0.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
957 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
91.87GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
288
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.312 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
894.0 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
102W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF114
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy