Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (106W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +5%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
3
192
Shading Units
144
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF116
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy