Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 +132%
1.111 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1111 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
GM107-300-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy