Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA P106 090

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
P106 090 +393%
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP106
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy