Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +65%
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
12
28
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
R600
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy