Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
AMD Radeon HD 6750 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (86W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6750 +111%
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
9
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
720
64
TMUs
36
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
86W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Juniper
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy