Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +1509%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 10
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy