Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +4151%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
72
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
28
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 21
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy