Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +556%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
32bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy