Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA T400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
T400 +129%
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy