Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (31W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps +816%
2.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
112
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.40 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.645 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.822 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
31W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU117
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy