Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
10000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +7647%
52.22 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
80
240
Shading Units
10240
80
TMUs
320
28
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
320W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD103
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy