Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs ATI FirePro V8800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +324%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1600
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
208W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Cypress
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy