Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM +29%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Oland
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy